In this series, I dig a little deeper into the meaning of psychology-related terms. This week we’re going to look at the psychology of cuteness.
Whether your preference is human babies or babies of the animal variety, they’re cute. Even if the associated adults are rather unattractive, the babies just tug at the heartstrings, and there’s probably a good reason behind that.
The baby schema
In 1971, zoologist Konrad Lorenz first proposed that babies are cute for an evolutionary reason. They need parental care, and being cute might make them more likely to get it. “Baby schema” features include large eyes, a large head, a large, bulging forehead, a small nose and mouth, and chubby cheeks. Add in a plump body shape, kissable skin, and a little eau de bébé smell, and you’ve got a magical package.
This paper by Glocker and colleagues includes photos that show how the baby schema features can be digitally manipulated to produce images of higher and lower cuteness. Small changes in those key features can make a big difference. This may have implications for parents of infants with conditions like cleft lip/palate. The cuteness response is unconscious, and that cleft lip/palate affects key features within that baby schema.
Cute animals
Cuteness in baby animals seems to work the same way as it does in humans. Social psychologist Daniel Kruger studied human reactions to baby animals and found the photos that people rated as being cute were of species in which the young needed parental care. Two different reptile images were used, only one of which was a species in which the young required parental care. There was a very clear ugly/cute contrast between the two.
The impact of cute
Cute babies don’t just have an impact on their parents; their cuteness can motivate caretaking behaviours in adults, even if it’s not their child. In an evolutionary sense, this makes sense, as there would have been times when other adults would have had to step in to play a caretaking role.
Cuteness grabs our attention and brings baby to front of mind. That happens whether it’s a human baby, animal baby, or even an inanimate object like a doll. The orbitofrontal cortex area of the brain starts to do a happy dance; this begins about 140 milliseconds after we see a baby.
When babies are so cute you just want to shmoooosh them to pieces, there’s a name for that: “cute aggression.” This happens more with animals than with human babies, and it involves the activation of the brain’s pleasure pathways.
Women tend to be more sensitive to differences in cuteness, and premenopausal women are more sensitive than postmenopausal. It even makes a difference if women are on contraceptives that raise their hormone levels.
The problem with being less cute?
In a 1984 study by McCabe, children between ages 3 and 6 who had more adult-like facial proportions were more likely to have experienced physical abuse than children with more childlike proportions. The researcher suggested that parents may have had unrealistic expectations of children whose features suggested they were older than their actual age and less dependent and in need of care.
I’m a total sucker for cuteness. I don’t particularly like kids, but my brain still does the baby cuteness dance. And baby animals make the world go ’round.
Do you tend to react strongly to cuteness?
References
- Katz, B. (2018). Why We Want to Squeeze Cute, Little Things. Smithsonian Magazine.
- McCabe, V. (1984). Abstract perceptual information for age level: A risk factor for maltreatment? Child Development, 55(1) 267-276.
- Preston, E. (2015). Which Baby Animals Look Cute? It May Be No Accident. Discover Magazine.
- Kringelbach, M.L. (2016). How cute things hijack our brains and drive behaviour. The Conversation.
- Wikipedia: Cuteness
The Psychology Corner has an overview of terms covered in the What Is… series, along with a collection of scientifically validated psychological tests.
Ashley L. Peterson
BScPharm BSN MPN
Ashley is a former mental health nurse and pharmacist and the author of four books.
I’m not exactly sure I like the word ‘cute’ applied to humans but I’m ok with it for animals…I think with baby animals it’s their softness – hence the popularity of what are now called ‘plushies’ (we just called them stuffed animals). Human babies aren’t so soft but yes to the big eyes – big eyes will get me every time…But babies aren’t my thing – they are kind of boring – feed one end, keep the other end dry – I like kids when they are a bit more autonomous and have some personality – Good thing I never had kids, eh? LOL
Same here! Seeing my baby niece for an hour is good, but then I’m done! And I agree, softness i key. I hadn’t heard of plushies, so I guess I’m stuck a few decades in the past. 😉
I’m weird…I don’t find babies cute, but baby animals I’ll die for lol. That is unfortunate that kids that look less cute are more likely to be abused. I wish we weren’t such a visual creature.
Yeah, that could solve a lot of problems.
I think all babies are cute! They lose their cuteness when they learn the word “no”. It is then you pray for patience…lol
So true!
I never knew there was a name for that: “cute aggression.” I think I’ve felt that a few times, and thought it was odd. I wonder though if these principles of cuteness apply to things other than babies — that is, to anything that registers as “cute” — even inanimate objects, or older people. I’m just wondering, because it doesn’t seem covered in the post.
Inanimate objects with baby schema features can trigger the cuteness response. I didn’t come across anything that made reference to older people. I’m not sure if facial features start to converge back to baby schema with aging, or perhaps it’s more a cultural issue of infantilizing the elderly.
Either explanation makes sense.
Yes, we react to cuteness. When we get ornery and low on compassion toward self or children, we imagine them as itty bitty Littles (or look at photos) and that softens us up a little.
We saw baby Grizzly Bears and they looked like little anteaters!! Some Pygmy species are perennially cute even as they age (pygmy nuthatch).
Oh, that’s adorable!
Yes, I was aware of the speculation surrounding the evolution of cuteness. Correct or not, I really could not say. I don’t know about you, but I do find reductionism so very depressing!
Yup: just about the terrible-twos, when many women (like my mother) who had babies suddenly stop thinking it’s fun.
Ah…
Yes. I reached to cute. Online, where there is a finite beginning and end. Because cuteness sucks you in to more work. 🙃
That’s a fascinating article. I kept waiting to see a baby picture of myself. It’s been all downhill since about 8 weeks old.
Lol
Been following your page for some time now. Well done on all your posts.
I am new on wordpress and I would love some support for my posts, if you will. Thank you ❤️
Interesting! This is something totally new for me. Wow!
I have the baby cuteness dance all the time towards babies, animals and sometimes even cute adults. Haha…
However, I always try my best to show care towards all as how I always tried my best to help my students who approached me with their problems when I was a university lecturer.
I have been trying to persuade myself to focus on one more thing. The cute, silly, innocent, vulnerable, attention-seeking side of a human soul that needs care. Haha…
I agree, we all have that cute, silly, innocent, vulnerable, attention-seeking side that is very much deserving of care.
Haha… This is sooooo cute😍
Cuteness overload for all babies & critters. I just love them all. Well, maybe not baby snakes 😄
And snakes as an exception actually fits in with the idea that cuteness is only a thing when parents provide care to their young.
I have to say my brain definitely does a massive cuteness dance. I’m ashamed to admit it but when I worked in a school and then a nursery there were kids that I did find cuter and wanted to work with more often because of that ‘Baby Schema’ set up.
It’s fascinating how automatic that reaction is.